noadastralnewtown.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the noadastralnewtown.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host noadastralnewtown.com. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Heart Internet Ltd .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache/2.4.33 (Unix) containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

comments posts sky coverage of nant 1st oct the site from the air nant invested in some professional aerial photography from www.airshots.co.uk . the shots show how the urbanisation of ipswich is encroaching upon the deben and the abrupt change to a rural environment past the bt site. click for more. the story so far bt submitted a planning application in 2008 , followed by another in 2009 , to build 2000 homes on the greenfield site to the south and east of the bt site adjacent to the suffolk coasts and heaths area of outstanding natural beauty ( aonb ). also in october 2008 bt wrote to the east of england regional assembly in response to a request saying that their site could potentially accommodate up to 3500 homes. suffolk coastal district council (scdc) have produced a "local development framework" (ldf) . there was significant public opposition to the policies chosen and none of our local representatives voted for it. our mission nant's mission is to protect the quality of the environment and local communities in the area currently threatened by suffolk coastal district council's planning strategy and bt's planning application. their proposal is to build at least 2,000 houses on greenfield land next to adastral park. we oppose bt's planning application and the local development framework in its current form. we are working to persuade suffolk coastal district council to use the opportunity opened up by the coalition government’s changed policies to consider other options. we are not opposed to house building, but we dispute the figures for the number of houses needed. we are pushing for a reassessment of actual housing need. we want to see the area next to adastral park retained as farm land or restored to its original heathland state. we want suffolk coastal to distribute future housing over a number of smaller developments across the district, and better meet the need for affordable housing in rural areas. reasons to reject the plan the area’s rural character. impact on the environment. worsening traffic congestion. building on greenfield land. destroy nearby villages. exacerbate climate change. the local education system. housing won’t be near the jobs. it will be an eyesore. new ‘community’ isolated. houses aren’t needed for jobs. planning application premature. more: news nant update january 2018 scdc approve the outline planning application for 2000 houses at adastral park nant supporters have, for a number of years, challenged the way in which suffolk coastal selected the site at adastral park for an allocation of 2000 houses, and in doing so, mirrored an outline planning application put forward by bt in 2009. the high court established that scdc’s process of selecting the adastral site was unlawful and by the time the matter reached the court of appeal the council accepted that its “consultation” to double the number of houses on the site to 2000 was also unlawful. however, the courts found that the council “saved” itself by carrying out a further consultation, which is said to have “cured” the earlier illegality. during this legal process suffolk coastal was not able to determine, as had been its stated intention in 2012, the bt application and the developers who had been working with bt lost interest/pulled out. the land at adastral park was subsequently sold and a new outline planning application put forward by carlyle land/ceg. we are not surprised that suffolk coastal has mow approved this outline application, it was pretty much a forgone conclusion, but many aspects of the application are still to be agreed through ongoing applications via the reserved matters process. we will continue to monitor and try to influence the ongoing details of this application as they come forward. the positive that we can perhaps take from the current situation is that the long delay caused by the legal challenge has resulted in the absolutely awful application put forward by bt/david lock being withdrawn. we consider that in many respects the carlyle/ceg application is an improvement on the bt application. nonetheless we remain concerned over the impact that any development of 2000 houses at adastral park will have on the deben estuary special protection area, the transport network, both the a12 and the local rural roads, plus the many other negative impacts that this scale of development will inevitably create. we think that most people maintain the opinion that in identifying the adastral park site for 2000 houses, suffolk coastal made an appalling decision and the motivation of those pushing for that decision has never been satisfactorily understood. incidentally, at the planning committee meeting, cllr smith was still advocating that there should be a number of 6/7 storey residential blocks included on the site. he also, twice, invited the developer to come and speak to him separately regarding “his” plans to have large-scale development at felixstowe. we will post a further update with any news and in the meantime we wait for the ruling of the echr on the nant legal challenge. nant steering group suffolk coastal approves 2,000 homes at adastral park see eadt article ceg meetings dear nant supporter you may already be aware that a developer/land promoter, ceg, has recently bought the land around bt adastral park. notification of the public consultation meetings being held by the new owners have recently been sent to all households in the local communities. the meetings will be in martlesham on december 1st and waldringfield on december 6th – details attached. nant is not suggesting taking any group action at this stage but you may wish to attend the meetings so that you can raise any issues directly with the new developer. we will send out an update after the meetings. eadt:adastral park 2,000-home community could be under way in 2017 ceg, a land promotion and property company specialising in the promotion of large scale development opportunities throughout the uk, is negotiating with bt to purchase the site. read article in eadt nant update-march 2016 various actions have been taking place since the last update but the ongoing legal process has been rather like trudging through treacle. here is a brief summary of the last 12 months. our case was heard by the court of appeal but its ruling in february last year went against us, even though the judges agreed that there were two instances of unlawful conduct at critical stages in suffolk coastal’s decision-making process. we had succeeded in the high court in establishing that scdc’s process of selecting the adastral site was unlawful under the eu habitat and environmental directives. by the time the matter reached the court of appeal the council also accepted that the “consultation” to double the number of houses on the site to 2000 was also unlawful. nonetheless the court of appeal held that despite these serious failures of process, later consultation was sufficient to retrospectively legitimise the council’s choice. this is difficult to accept as scdc has refused to revisit the decisions that were informed by this unlawful conduct. on the advice of our lawyer, richard buxton, we then sought permission from the supreme court for our case to be heard there. in may we were informed that our application for permission had been refused. richard was “profoundly concerned at the way the courts have dealt with the requirements of eu law” with reference to ours, and other recent cases. in september he advised us to ask the supreme court to reconsider its decision and to seek again permission for our case to be heard. we have now been informed that the supreme court will not give us permission. this means that we have explored every aspect of the english legal process and have exhausted all possible options. however, richard feels very strongly that the matter should not end here. he is therefore examining the various avenues open to us via europe. we will of course let you know if there are any furth

URL analysis for noadastralnewtown.com

http://noadastralnewtown.com/?m=201311
http://noadastralnewtown.com/?cat=14
http://noadastralnewtown.com/?page_id=1861
http://noadastralnewtown.com/?feed=rss2
http://noadastralnewtown.com/?page_id=1601
http://noadastralnewtown.com/?p=4278
http://noadastralnewtown.com/?cat=15
http://noadastralnewtown.com/?cat=23
http://noadastralnewtown.com/?m=201408
http://noadastralnewtown.com/?cat=21
http://noadastralnewtown.com/?cat=20
http://noadastralnewtown.com/?cat=27
http://noadastralnewtown.com/?cat=25
http://noadastralnewtown.com/?cat=24
http://noadastralnewtown.com/?m=201401
bbc.co.uk
apps3.suffolkcoastal.gov.uk
ipswichstar.co.uk
eadt.co.uk
aonb.org.uk
suffolkcoastal.gov.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: NOADASTRALNEWTOWN.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1571718069_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.meshdigital.com
Registrar URL: http://www.meshdigital.com
Updated Date: 2017-09-29T14:11:08Z
Creation Date: 2009-10-09T07:42:41Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-10-09T07:42:41Z
Registrar: Mesh Digital Limited
Registrar IANA ID: 1390
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS1.MAINNAMESERVER.COM
Name Server: NS2.MAINNAMESERVER.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2017-10-17T04:54:47Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR Mesh Digital Limited

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =noadastralnewtown.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME noadastralnewtown.com

  CHANGED 2017-09-29

  CREATED 2009-10-09

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS1.MAINNAMESERVER.COM 79.170.40.2

  NS2.MAINNAMESERVER.COM 79.170.43.3

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .